Wow.
I personally think this is crazy-talk, but thank you to everyone who nominated and voted for me as a finalist for this year’s “Best Hire”.
Wow.
I personally think this is crazy-talk, but thank you to everyone who nominated and voted for me as a finalist for this year’s “Best Hire”.
caro:
fek:
+1
I dunno, when people ask me how I’m doing I routinely tell them “God, it’s killing me.” I think the rigors of a leadership position (or really any position at all) are a pretty common topic of discussion these days. Pretty much everyone understands that working at a successful startup is likely to have a strong negative impact on your life, health, relationships, and overal mental state.
I’m with Harry on this one.
Working at a startup means higher highs and lower lows, which most often aren’t even tied to the company’s performance. It’s a side-effect of the type of work we’re in, and the fact that we commit our souls to it. One day you’re crushing it, and the next you’re being crushed. It could be product-related, or triggered by user feedback. Maybe you’re blown away by a co-worker or a partner, or you’re feeling disappointed by them. Or, maybe it’s just the frustration from always wanting to get to tomorrow one day earlier.
When someone asks me how we’re doing, no matter what the answer is, positive or negative, it is usually followed up with “ask me next week and I’ll have a different answer for you”. You get beat down, and you get energized, and over time you realize it’s all just waves on the ocean.
Related to this is the perpetual statement that “the next couple of months are going to be really important for us.” It sounds trite, but in startup world it is always true, as least on the micro level. Step forward a year or two, and maybe X wasn’t the milestone you thought it was going to be leading up to it, but if you don’t feel like what you’re working on today is the most important thing that you could possibly be working on, then you’re doing something wrong.
(via harryh)
A few days ago there was a thread going on the Seattle Tech Startups mailing list, about whether DEMO was worth participating in. Having been there twice, I chimed in with a list of 7 key points that should be considered when deciding if DEMO is right for you. I received a lot of positive responses from the list, so thought I’d share it here as well.
From: daryn@eyejot.com
Subject: Re: DEMO conference
Date: October 22, 2007 11:05:22 AM PDT
To: organize@seattletechstartups.comLike most things, DEMO is not one size fits all. Here are some of my observations from launching at DEMO twice: one being a dud, and one being quite a success.
Would I do it again? In a heartbeat, assuming I could handle each of the following points.
1. Have a consumer-friendly product that people can touch or play with immediately
- unless it is really sexy or honestly revolutionary, I wouldn’t bother launching an enterprise or b2b product there.2. Hire PR assistance
- if you’re going to spend the $25k+ on the conference, spend another 5k on an experienced PR person who has done DEMO before. Have them wrangle the press and bring them by your table as well as setup interviews.3. Be prepared
- have the product ready, have the pitch down, and be ready to answer all the hard questions.
- I agree with Clay from Yodio. Too much emphasis is put on the 6-minutes on stage. Truth be told, half the crowd isn’t paying attention, and if they are interested, they’ll come followup with you during your pavilion time. The pavillion is where you man a table, demo your product, and talk to attendees 1-to-1.4. Know the audience
- the crowd is primarily investors, press, and other presenters. When talking to someone, check out their badge and structure the conversation accordingly.5. Be involved
- this isn’t just another conference for you. It’s a big deal. Be prepared to spend 3 days, the full 72 hours, ON. Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, Late night. Don’t hide up in your room working, this is in-person, buzz-building, and networking time. The other 71 hours and 54 minutes are WAY more important than the 6 on stage.6. Bring a team
- your 18k includes 3 attendees. That’s the minimum number of educated people, who can pitch the product, that should be there (Someone who cannot pitch and field questions, or at least carry conversation until someone else is free, is useless)
- An extra one or two people can make a big difference in letting you not get burnt out, and being the most effective (walking the room, doing interviews, breaks, etc., while not neglecting your station)7. Know your post-DEMO plan
- why are you there? to build buzz? to forge partnerships? to raise money? DEMO is not the end-game.
Why DEMO was a failure for MyPW:
I didn’t follow any of the 7 rules listed above. Leading up to, and during, the conference I was scrambling to finish building the service, juggling meetings, stuffing envelopes, and doing kinko’s runs. There were only two of us there who knew the product, and I was exhausted the entire time.Why DEMO was a success for Eyejot:
We followed 6 of the 7 rules ( all except #7 ). We got great press (WSJ, USA Today, CNET, …), and lots of interest from attendees. I’d say at least half of the people at the conference stopped by, and recorded an eyejot to send to their family or colleagues back home. Our one flaw was that we had so much momentum leading up to DEMO, that we hadn’t spent much time focused on the post-launch, besides a development-roadmap. We definitely had the post-DEMO glow, but weren’t quite ready to follow-through with many of the leads we formed, primarily in regards to partnerships and fundraising, and the wave passes quickly.
That said, I still get “You guys were at DEMO weren’t you?” and it’s definitely a credibility builder. It has more broad reach and lasting power than a techcrunch post, but you need to give it serious thought, and make sure you’re committed if you want to get the most out of it.
Hope that helps!
Daryn
(originally posted on my now-abandoned Vox blog)